Filletti & Filletti Advocates
Filletti & Filletti Advocates
  • Home
  • Legal Services
  • Legal Resources
  • About Us
  • Consular
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Legal Services
  • Legal Resources
  • About Us
  • Consular
  • Contact Us

← All Posts

Conflicts and controversies in instruments of mutual recognition

27 June 2025 | Criminal Law

Conflicts and controversies in instruments of mutual recognition

Conflicts and controversies in the concurrent execution of multiple instruments of mutual recogntiion: The Bharwani case in Malta

On 28 February 2024, police and judicial authorities in several European countries, led by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and Europol, arrested fourteen individuals on suspicion of being involved in a €195 million VAT fraud scheme across various countries. Searches were carried out in over 100 countries, including Malta. Europol reported that the suspects had allegedly established a sophisticated criminal network enabling them to defraud up to EUR 195 million through schemes involving the sale of small electronic devices, such as smartphones, without allegedly fulfilling their tax obligations.1

Amongst those arrested, a Maltese suspect was investigated. With respect to this Maltese individual, a European Investigation Order (‘EIO’) was issued by Swedish authorities for the collection of data and documents found in Malta. Additionally, a European Arrest Warrant (‘EAW’) was also issued for his surrender to Sweden. These two instruments of mutual recognition were executed in the Maltese territory at the same time. The timing of their execution, however, created particular legal difficulties. The execution of the EIO led to the seizure of many documents and data owned by the suspect. The documents and data were seized and dispatched to the requesting State. Meanwhile, during the EAW proceedings for his surrender, the suspect requested that he be granted access to or copies of the seized documents, which were crucial for him to defend himself in the EAW proceedings. Copies were not made in time, and the suspect was never told whether the documents and data had already been dispatched to the requesting State. This meant that the requested person in the EAW proceedings could not defend himself adequately because he had been deprived of the very same documents needed for his defence.

Read more:

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20322844251349007#core-collateral-share

Filletti & Filletti Advocates

Malta-based legal counsel across criminal, civil, property and family law.

123 Old Bakery Street, Valletta, Malta

+356 2125 1196 · info@fillettiadvocates.com

Quick Links

About UsLegal ResourcesConsular ServicesContact Us

Practice Areas

Criminal DefenceCivil & CommercialProperty LawFamily Law

Copyright © 2026 Filletti & Filletti Advocates - All Rights Reserved.

This website uses cookies.

We use essential cookies to run this site. With your consent, we also set an anonymous visitor-ID cookie and remember ad-campaign click IDs (Google/Facebook) for basic traffic attribution — nothing is sold or shared with third-party advertisers. You can accept or reject this optional tracking below.

RejectAccept